Skip to main content
Call
RARC N264 · Remittance Advice Remark Code

RARC N264 Remark Code: Missing/incomplete/invalid ordering provider name

Reviewed by QuickIntell RCM Editorial Team · Last reviewed

Updated

Not an ICD-10 code. RARC N264 is a remittance-advice remark code published by X12 and carried on the 835 LQ segment. Any ICD-10 code with the same letters and digits (e.g., ICD-10 M15 osteoarthritis, N130 other urinary tract disorders) is a separate, unrelated code set used in diagnoses on the 837. Confirm the context before acting on this page.

TL;DR

RARC N264 (X12 Missing/incomplete/invalid ordering provider name). Commonly paired with CARC 16, CARC 183. RARC N264 flags missing/invalid ordering provider name on the claim — a companion to N265 for NPI.

Official X12 description

“Missing/incomplete/invalid ordering provider name.”

Source: X12 Remittance Advice Remark Codes. X12 publishes and maintains the RARC set; always verify against the current release before building a claim workflow.

Paired CARC codes

RARC N264 almost never appears alone — it accompanies one of the CARCs below on the same 835 remittance line. Fix the CARC and the RARC typically clears; the RARC alone is informational.

Paired CARCWhat the CARC means
CARC 16Claim/service lacks information or has submission/billing error(s).
CARC 183The referring provider is not eligible to refer the service billed.
CARC 206National Provider Identifier - missing.

What RARC N264 actually means

RARC N264 flags missing/invalid ordering provider name on the claim — a companion to N265 for NPI. Correct and rebill.

Common root causes

  • Ordering provider name blank or mismatched to NPI.

Prevention checklist

  • Order-to-name automation at EHR.

Resolution & appeal strategy — step by step

Because RARC N264 is supplemental to a CARC, the resolution path usually starts by fixing the underlying adjustment reason. A formal appeal of the RARC alone is rarely necessary.

  1. 1Correct name and resubmit.
Sample reconsideration language referencing RARC N264
[Provider letterhead] Re: Reconsideration — Claim #{claim_number}, CARC 16 / RARC N264 Member: {member_name} · Member ID: {member_id} Date(s) of Service: {dos} The 835 remittance on {remittance_date} carried RARC N264: "Missing/incomplete/invalid ordering provider name." We request reconsideration. The attached documentation rebuts the remark code: 1. [State the fact that rebuts the remark — authorization number, primary 835, modifier rationale, LCD citation, etc.] 2. [Reference the paired CARC and the corresponding fix] 3. [Attach the supporting document listed in step 1] Attached: {list supporting documents} Please process this line under the member's benefits. Contact the billing office at {provider_phone} for questions. Sincerely, {billing_manager_name}, {credentials}

Edit the bracketed fields before sending. Payer-specific reconsideration forms are often required — check the provider portal first.

How common is RARC N264?

Platform frequency
Pending ETL

Platform frequency ranks publish once the anonymized denial-rate pipeline reaches the publication threshold (strategy §12 Phase 2).

How QuickRCM handles RARC N264

QuickRCM reads RARC N264 alongside its paired CARC in the 835 LQ segment and routes the line to the correct worker queue with the right documentation already attached:

  • Denial routing rules tuned to the CARC+RARC pair — the paired combination tells QuickRCM which documentation the payer will accept.
  • Reconsideration template for this exact remark code pulls the supporting facts from the claim automatically.
  • Pre-submission scrubs that catch the preventable drivers surfaced on this page before the 837 leaves the clearinghouse.
See QuickRCM →Book a demo

Frequently asked questions — RARC N264

What does RARC N264 mean?

RARC N264 is an X12 Remittance Advice Remark Code. The official X12 definition is: "Missing/incomplete/invalid ordering provider name." It is supplemental to a Claim Adjustment Reason Code (CARC) on the same 835 line.

Which CARC is paired with RARC N264?

RARC N264 is most commonly paired with CARC 16, CARC 183, CARC 206. The CARC is the financial adjustment reason; the RARC is the informational remark. Fix the paired CARC first — the RARC usually clears with the corrected claim.

How do I resolve a RARC N264 remark on a remit?

Start from the root cause: Ordering provider name blank or mismatched to NPI. First step: Correct name and resubmit. Because RARCs are supplemental, the resolution is almost always to address the paired CARC rather than appeal the RARC alone.

Where does RARC N264 appear on the 835 ERA?

RARC N264 is carried on the 835 Loop 2110 LQ segment alongside the CARC in the CAS segment of the same service line. The code and its X12 description also print on the paper EOB in the "Remark Code" or "Remark" column next to the corresponding denial or adjustment reason.

Is RARC N264 the same as ICD-10 code N264?

No. RARC N264 is a remittance-advice remark code published by X12 and carried on the 835. Any ICD-10 code with the same letters and digits is a diagnosis code on the 837 HI segment — a completely different code set maintained by the WHO/CMS. Use the transaction context (835 = RARC; 837 = ICD-10) to disambiguate.

Disclaimer

This page is operational reference for medical-billing professionals. It is not legal, clinical, or contractual advice. X12 code descriptors are maintained by the X12 External Code Lists; always verify against the current X12 release and the payer's own published policy before submitting or appealing a claim.