What to review in a product demo
Follow a claim from aging and deadline prioritization through status investigation, payer contact evidence, next action, and payment reconciliation. Inspect the handoff to denials or contract review.
Bring claim, payment, and denial records into assigned work queues. Document payer follow-up, review deadlines and potential underpayments, and keep the next action visible to specialists and managers.
TL;DR
Product workflow demonstration with sample records.

Healthcare accounts receivable software organizes unpaid claims and balances into work queues. Staff review the original claim, payment, denial, documentation, payer response, and previous actions before choosing the next step. QuickIntell supports assignments, follow-up records, deadline review, underpayment investigation, and reporting. A case is resolved using confirmed account evidence; a planned call or estimated recovery does not establish payment.
Incomplete claim status, missing documentation, unmatched payments, and unassigned follow-up can leave balances unresolved. Review the underlying records and assign the responsible team before selecting the next action.
Compare equivalent account groups and distinguish open balances from actual payments.
Validate claim, remit, and account matches before approving balance changes.
Review applicable terms and effective dates before disputing a potential underpayment.
Baseline comparison
Days in AR
Equivalent account cohorts
Aged balances
AR > 90
Track payer and age cohorts
Completed work
Touches/day
Include review and manual follow-up
Deadline evidence
Timely-filing write-offs
Record actual actions and receipts
Confirmed payments
Underpayment recovery
Separate flags from recovered cash
Manual calls
Who reviews unresolved responses and records the next action?
Configured calls with specialist follow-up
Manual review
Which document establishes the deadline and accepted route?
Assigned deadline worklists and submission records
Potential contract variance
Which terms, effective dates, and payments support the request?
Variance review and approved dispute handoff
Confirm source systems, interfaces, vendor permissions, record identifiers, and handoff mappings.
Confirm deadline sources, queue rules, reviewer permissions, and approved follow-up policies.
Review proposed matches and priorities, assign cases, and document approved follow-up actions.
Live dashboards for DSO, aging buckets, recovery rate, cash forecast, and agent productivity.
Use comparable payer, claim age, balance, and work-type groups. Review actual completed actions, confirmed cash, unresolved cases, and staff effort before attributing a change to the software.
Explore the A/R timing worksheet
Review your EHR, clearinghouse, deposit, and finance interfaces so A/R queues use the available claim, remit, contract, and ledger records.
Validate the specific systems, versions, vendor permissions, available inputs, mappings, update scope, and reconciliation. Demonstrate failed connections and the manual fallback before launch.
for clinics/MSOs up to ~$1M monthly AR
for groups $1–5M monthly AR
enterprises >$5M monthly AR
The listed monthly base prices exclude separately quoted usage. Request a written rate card identifying each enabled channel, its billable unit, unit rate, included allowance, overage rules and any third-party charges. SMS, voice and printed-statement terms must be confirmed for your proposed scope; no per-unit rates or at-cost pass-through guarantee are published here.
The meeting links on this page schedule a discussion. They do not activate a trial, approve production access or accept commercial terms.
Confirm current plan pricing, included volumes, interfaces, setup, training, support, usage charges, optional outreach, and historical import scope in writing. These amounts are advertised starting plans, not a guaranteed total engagement cost.
Review deployment-specific hosting, encryption, credentials, role permissions, audit records, retention, subprocessors, and applicable data agreements. Request supporting evidence and have your privacy and security teams confirm the proposed scope.
Start with your payer mix, source systems, open-account records, current queues, and responsible reviewers. Agree on data access, mappings, deadline sources, representative test cases, failure handling, and acceptance criteria. Implementation timing depends on those dependencies and should be agreed in the proposal.
Test representative claim, payment, denial, and account records, including duplicate identifiers, partial payments, reversals, and missing information. Review proposed matches and exception handling before enabling downstream updates. No universal match rate is promised.
The workflow can coordinate configured payer calls and retain the resulting notes and reference identifiers. Validate approved scripts, authorized access, supported call paths, retries, and the handoff to a specialist. Confirm important status statements against the payer response before changing an account or marking a case resolved.
Payer work concerns claim status, documentation, remittances, and bill disputes. Patient outreach concerns the confirmed balance, communication preferences, consent, disputes, and agreed payment options. Define separate owners and approved policies for each scope; software configuration alone does not establish compliance or authorization to contact a recipient.
Route cases using the documented deadline, its source, claim type, and responsible owner. Review the required submission or dispute route and preserve receipts for the action actually completed. A reminder, generated letter, or protective fax draft does not establish timely filing or acceptance.
Compare the remit and account with applicable contract terms and effective dates. Review adjustments, entitlement, supporting documents, and the payer dispute route before requesting payment. A flagged variance or opened dispute is not recovered cash.
Keep payer status, denials, and disputes separate from patient balances, statements, payment plans, and disputed responsibility. Validate account classification, review permissions, and escalation before enabling outreach or account changes.
Review the configured payer, aging, balance, deadline, unresolved-information, and previous-action signals behind each queue. Managers should be able to inspect assignments, adjust priorities, and record the reason for an override. Evaluate missed cases and false alerts with representative account groups.
Agree on queue rules, next-action dates, escalation owners, approved templates, balance holds, and reviewer permissions. Test those policies against representative cases and retain the required approvals before enabling automatic actions.
Confirm the specific finance system, available interfaces, account structure, field mapping, permissions, and update receipts. Review reconciliation and failed exports or updates with finance. System names do not establish a supported interface for every version or deployment.
Evaluate the actual clearinghouse, remittance, deposit, and billing inputs available under your existing agreements. Confirm interface permissions, identifier matching, exceptions, and any proposed system changes. Demonstrate your selected handoffs before launch.
Define comparable payer, age, balance, and claim cohorts and a documented baseline. Track open balances, confirmed cash, unresolved exceptions, deadline actions, staff effort, and completed follow-up. Separate estimated recoverability from actual payment and include review, setup, and operating costs when evaluating return.
Request deployment-specific data flows, hosting, credentials, access controls, audit records, retention, subprocessors, and applicable data agreements. Have your privacy and security teams confirm the evidence and scope before sensitive records are shared. No blanket certification is established by a workflow description.
Validate entity identifiers, record ownership, user permissions, export boundaries, and consolidated reporting. Test cross-entity access restrictions and account matching using representative records before combining worklists or reports.
Assess the available claims, payments, adjustments, account identifiers, balances, and source dates first. Agree on the import period, reconciliation, duplicate handling, and treatment of closed or disputed balances. Historical data quality and access determine the feasible scope.
Book a demo to discuss whether an evaluation is available for your organization. Any trial scope, duration, charges and permitted data must be agreed before access is enabled. Booking a meeting does not start a free trial.
The listed monthly base prices exclude separately quoted usage. Request a written rate card identifying each enabled channel, its billable unit, unit rate, included allowance, overage rules and any third-party charges. SMS, voice and printed-statement terms must be confirmed for your proposed scope; no per-unit rates or at-cost pass-through guarantee are published here.
Let AI voice agents handle payer status calls and return reference IDs to the A/R timeline.
Coordinate claims, denials, payment posting, and collector queues on one revenue cycle workflow.
Turn denied balances into prioritized appeals with payer-specific evidence and deadline tracking.
Scrub and submit cleaner claims before they become aging A/R or timely-filing risk.
Review patient balances, disputed responsibility, payment options, and outreach under your approved policies.
Auto-post ERAs/EOBs, validate underpayments, and keep GL exports clean for finance.
Insurance AR teams prioritizing aging claims, documenting payer follow-up, and reconciling the outcome.
Follow a claim from aging and deadline prioritization through status investigation, payer contact evidence, next action, and payment reconciliation. Inspect the handoff to denials or contract review.
Confirm the AR inventory, practice ledger, submission and remittance history, and available payer contact channels. Reconcile balances before using them for prioritization.
Staff approve material claim changes, write-offs, and collection decisions. Missing filing evidence and disputed balances require investigation; age alone does not establish collectability.
Start with a reconciled sample across aging buckets and payers. Agree follow-up cadence, documentation, escalation authority, and outcome reconciliation before extending the queue.
Discuss AR inventory, connected systems, contact channels, reporting, users, implementation, and support. Insurance follow-up and patient collections are separately defined scopes.
Use software when your staff will operate this workflow. Review managed service scope when you want Quickintell to perform the agreed work.
Book a product demo