Skip to main content
A/R work queues and follow-up

Healthcare Accounts Receivable Software

Bring claim, payment, and denial records into assigned work queues. Document payer follow-up, review deadlines and potential underpayments, and keep the next action visible to specialists and managers.

TL;DR

  • Prioritized worklists
  • Documented deadline review
  • Underpayment investigation

Product workflow demonstration with sample records.

Revenue-cycle specialist and clinician resolving a billing workflow together

What is AI-powered accounts receivable follow-up?

Healthcare accounts receivable software organizes unpaid claims and balances into work queues. Staff review the original claim, payment, denial, documentation, payer response, and previous actions before choosing the next step. QuickIntell supports assignments, follow-up records, deadline review, underpayment investigation, and reporting. A case is resolved using confirmed account evidence; a planned call or estimated recovery does not establish payment.

Make unresolved balances and next actions visible.

Incomplete claim status, missing documentation, unmatched payments, and unassigned follow-up can leave balances unresolved. Review the underlying records and assign the responsible team before selecting the next action.

Coordinate A/R work with queue owners, documented follow-up, reviewer decisions, and traceable reporting.

Track aging and confirmed cash

Compare equivalent account groups and distinguish open balances from actual payments.

Review matches and exceptions

Validate claim, remit, and account matches before approving balance changes.

Investigate contract variances

Review applicable terms and effective dates before disputing a potential underpayment.

Measures for Your A/R Workflow

Baseline comparison

Days in AR

Equivalent account cohorts

Aged balances

AR > 90

Track payer and age cohorts

Completed work

Touches/day

Include review and manual follow-up

Deadline evidence

Timely-filing write-offs

Record actual actions and receipts

Confirmed payments

Underpayment recovery

Separate flags from recovered cash

Questions for Comparing A/R Workflows

Your current process
Questions for each proposal
QuickIntell A/R

Payer follow-up

Manual calls

Who reviews unresolved responses and records the next action?

Configured calls with specialist follow-up

Timely-filing

Manual review

Which document establishes the deadline and accepted route?

Assigned deadline worklists and submission records

Underpayments

Potential contract variance

Which terms, effective dates, and payments support the request?

Variance review and approved dispute handoff

How it works

1

Connect

Confirm source systems, interfaces, vendor permissions, record identifiers, and handoff mappings.

2

Configure

Confirm deadline sources, queue rules, reviewer permissions, and approved follow-up policies.

3

Run

Review proposed matches and priorities, assign cases, and document approved follow-up actions.

4

Measure

Live dashboards for DSO, aging buckets, recovery rate, cash forecast, and agent productivity.

Build a Baseline for Your Follow-up Workflow

Use comparable payer, claim age, balance, and work-type groups. Review actual completed actions, confirmed cash, unresolved cases, and staff effort before attributing a change to the software.

Explore the A/R timing worksheet
Revenue-cycle specialist and clinician resolving a billing workflow together

Feature groups

Automate

  • • AI Payment Matching: ERAs, EOBs, ACH, lockbox; auto-post and route exceptions.
  • • Smart Dunning & Outreach: Cadences by payer/patient risk, omnichannel (email/SMS/voice), dispute tracking.

Collaborate

  • • Collector Worklists: Risk-scored accounts with next-best-action and payer-specific playbooks.
  • • Tasking & Notes: Internal comments, @mentions, and audit-ready timelines across billing, coding, and finance.

Control

  • • Rules & Policies: Small-balance write-off thresholds, payment plans, hardship rules, and holds.
  • • Dispute & Promise-to-Pay: SLA timers, evidence attachments, automatic reminders, escalation paths.

Report

  • • Real-time Dashboards: DSO, CEI, average days delinquent, aging (0–30/31–60/61–90/91–120/120+).
  • • Cash Forecasting: Payer-specific curves, seasonality, and scenario planning for month-end close.
Timely Filing Alert

Deadline Review

  • • Review approaching deadlines using the controlling document, claim type, and assigned owner.
  • • Prepare correspondence from claim evidence; retain transmission receipts after a completed submission.
  • • Review the applicable corrected-claim route and retain original submission dates and reference IDs.

AI Voice Agents

  • • Automated payor calls for status checks, denial root-cause queries, and claim-not-on-file resolution.
  • • Validate the configured payer call path, authorized access, approved script, and specialist fallback.
  • • Retain the available call record and payer reference IDs in the follow-up timeline.

Integrations

Review your EHR, clearinghouse, deposit, and finance interfaces so A/R queues use the available claim, remit, contract, and ledger records.

EpicFHIR + HL7athenahealthREST + FHIROracle HealthCerner IgniteNextGenAPI + HL7eClinicalWorksFHIR + eBOAdvancedMDAPI + SFTPGreenwayREST + HL7
OpenEMRFHIR + REST
Availity270/271 + 835
Waystar837 + 835
Change HealthcareClaims + ERA
SSIClearinghouse

Validate the specific systems, versions, vendor permissions, available inputs, mappings, update scope, and reconciliation. Demonstrate failed connections and the manual fallback before launch.

Pricing

Starter

for clinics/MSOs up to ~$1M monthly AR

  • • Confirm included volumes, sources, and environments in the proposal
  • • Core AI matching, standard dashboards, email/SMS dunning
  • • Advertised $1,500/month + usage; confirm communication charges
Book a product demo

Growth

for groups $1–5M monthly AR

  • • Confirm volumes, interfaces, queue rules, and payer workflows
  • • Collector worklists, dispute workflows, custom exports, SSO
  • • Advertised $3,500/month + usage; confirm implementation and support scope
Request a product demo

Scale

enterprises >$5M monthly AR

  • • Agree on volumes, entity boundaries, ledger handoffs, and evaluation environments
  • • Confirm reporting, exports, support, and any service commitments
  • • Scoped quotation with agreed fees and exclusions
Request a product demo

Usage questions for your written quote

The listed monthly base prices exclude separately quoted usage. Request a written rate card identifying each enabled channel, its billable unit, unit rate, included allowance, overage rules and any third-party charges. SMS, voice and printed-statement terms must be confirmed for your proposed scope; no per-unit rates or at-cost pass-through guarantee are published here.

SMS
Confirm whether billing is per message or segment, which directions are billable, and whether carrier fees are separate.
Voice
Confirm the billable-minute definition, rounding, included allowance and treatment of unanswered or transferred calls.
Printed statements
If included in your scope, confirm the per-item charge and whether printing, mailing and postage are included.

The meeting links on this page schedule a discussion. They do not activate a trial, approve production access or accept commercial terms.

Confirm current plan pricing, included volumes, interfaces, setup, training, support, usage charges, optional outreach, and historical import scope in writing. These amounts are advertised starting plans, not a guaranteed total engagement cost.

Security and Data Review

Review deployment-specific hosting, encryption, credentials, role permissions, audit records, retention, subprocessors, and applicable data agreements. Request supporting evidence and have your privacy and security teams confirm the proposed scope.

Frequently Asked Questions

Start with your payer mix, source systems, open-account records, current queues, and responsible reviewers. Agree on data access, mappings, deadline sources, representative test cases, failure handling, and acceptance criteria. Implementation timing depends on those dependencies and should be agreed in the proposal.

Test representative claim, payment, denial, and account records, including duplicate identifiers, partial payments, reversals, and missing information. Review proposed matches and exception handling before enabling downstream updates. No universal match rate is promised.

The workflow can coordinate configured payer calls and retain the resulting notes and reference identifiers. Validate approved scripts, authorized access, supported call paths, retries, and the handoff to a specialist. Confirm important status statements against the payer response before changing an account or marking a case resolved.

Payer work concerns claim status, documentation, remittances, and bill disputes. Patient outreach concerns the confirmed balance, communication preferences, consent, disputes, and agreed payment options. Define separate owners and approved policies for each scope; software configuration alone does not establish compliance or authorization to contact a recipient.

Route cases using the documented deadline, its source, claim type, and responsible owner. Review the required submission or dispute route and preserve receipts for the action actually completed. A reminder, generated letter, or protective fax draft does not establish timely filing or acceptance.

Compare the remit and account with applicable contract terms and effective dates. Review adjustments, entitlement, supporting documents, and the payer dispute route before requesting payment. A flagged variance or opened dispute is not recovered cash.

Keep payer status, denials, and disputes separate from patient balances, statements, payment plans, and disputed responsibility. Validate account classification, review permissions, and escalation before enabling outreach or account changes.

Review the configured payer, aging, balance, deadline, unresolved-information, and previous-action signals behind each queue. Managers should be able to inspect assignments, adjust priorities, and record the reason for an override. Evaluate missed cases and false alerts with representative account groups.

Agree on queue rules, next-action dates, escalation owners, approved templates, balance holds, and reviewer permissions. Test those policies against representative cases and retain the required approvals before enabling automatic actions.

Confirm the specific finance system, available interfaces, account structure, field mapping, permissions, and update receipts. Review reconciliation and failed exports or updates with finance. System names do not establish a supported interface for every version or deployment.

Evaluate the actual clearinghouse, remittance, deposit, and billing inputs available under your existing agreements. Confirm interface permissions, identifier matching, exceptions, and any proposed system changes. Demonstrate your selected handoffs before launch.

Define comparable payer, age, balance, and claim cohorts and a documented baseline. Track open balances, confirmed cash, unresolved exceptions, deadline actions, staff effort, and completed follow-up. Separate estimated recoverability from actual payment and include review, setup, and operating costs when evaluating return.

Request deployment-specific data flows, hosting, credentials, access controls, audit records, retention, subprocessors, and applicable data agreements. Have your privacy and security teams confirm the evidence and scope before sensitive records are shared. No blanket certification is established by a workflow description.

Validate entity identifiers, record ownership, user permissions, export boundaries, and consolidated reporting. Test cross-entity access restrictions and account matching using representative records before combining worklists or reports.

Assess the available claims, payments, adjustments, account identifiers, balances, and source dates first. Agree on the import period, reconciliation, duplicate handling, and treatment of closed or disputed balances. Historical data quality and access determine the feasible scope.

Book a demo to discuss whether an evaluation is available for your organization. Any trial scope, duration, charges and permitted data must be agreed before access is enabled. Booking a meeting does not start a free trial.

The listed monthly base prices exclude separately quoted usage. Request a written rate card identifying each enabled channel, its billable unit, unit rate, included allowance, overage rules and any third-party charges. SMS, voice and printed-statement terms must be confirmed for your proposed scope; no per-unit rates or at-cost pass-through guarantee are published here.

Review Your A/R Work Queues in a Product Demo

Book a product demo

Evaluate accounts receivable automation for your team

Insurance AR teams prioritizing aging claims, documenting payer follow-up, and reconciling the outcome.

What to review in a product demo

Follow a claim from aging and deadline prioritization through status investigation, payer contact evidence, next action, and payment reconciliation. Inspect the handoff to denials or contract review.

Connections to your current systems

Confirm the AR inventory, practice ledger, submission and remittance history, and available payer contact channels. Reconcile balances before using them for prioritization.

Human review and release controls

Staff approve material claim changes, write-offs, and collection decisions. Missing filing evidence and disputed balances require investigation; age alone does not establish collectability.

Implementation and validation

Start with a reconciled sample across aging buckets and payers. Agree follow-up cadence, documentation, escalation authority, and outcome reconciliation before extending the queue.

Pricing and quotation

Discuss AR inventory, connected systems, contact channels, reporting, users, implementation, and support. Insurance follow-up and patient collections are separately defined scopes.