Where this LCD applies
Each contract number is a jurisdiction on the remittance; the policy binds claims processed under these contracts and no others.
| Contract | Contractor | Type | States |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15102 | CGS Administrators, LLC | MAC - Part B | KY |
| 15202 | CGS Administrators, LLC | MAC - Part B | OH |
| 15101 | CGS Administrators, LLC | MAC - Part A | KY |
| 15201 | CGS Administrators, LLC | MAC - Part A | OH |
Billing and coding: diagnoses and procedure codes
Since 2019 the codes live in the companion article rather than the LCD. Billing and Coding A59163 (Billing and Coding: MolDX: Molecular Assays for the Diagnosis of Cutaneous Melanoma) carries the diagnosis and procedure lists the contractor loads as the claims edit. CPT codes are shown as bare numbers because the descriptors are licensed by the AMA; HCPCS Level II descriptors are public and shown.
A59163: Billing and Coding: MolDX: Molecular Assays for the Diagnosis of Cutaneous Melanoma (Billing and Coding, effective 2026-01-22)
- Covered ICD-10-CM codes
- 18
- 1 group
- Non-covered ICD-10-CM codes
- 0
- Procedure codes listed
- 3
- Full article
- cms.gov record
| ICD-10-CM | Description (FY2027) |
|---|---|
| D22.0 | — |
| D22.10 | — |
| D22.111 | — |
| D22.112 | — |
| D22.121 | — |
| D22.122 | — |
| D22.20 | — |
| D22.21 | — |
| D22.22 | — |
| D22.39 | — |
| D22.4 | — |
| D22.5 | — |
| D22.61 | — |
| D22.62 | — |
| D22.71 | — |
| D22.72 | — |
| D22.9 | — |
| D48.5 | — |
Procedure codes: 0090U, 0314U, 81479.
Coverage indications, limitations and medical necessity
The purpose of this test is to assist dermatopathologists to arrive at the correct diagnosis of melanoma versus non-melanoma when examining skin biopsies.
This Medicare contractor will provide limited coverage for molecular Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)/ Ribonucleic acid (RNA) assays that aid in the diagnosis or exclusion of melanoma from a biopsy when ALL of the following clinical conditions are met:
• The test is ordered by a board-certified or board-eligible dermatopathologist
• The specimen is a primary (non-metastatic, non-re-excision specimen) cutaneous melanocytic neoplasm for which the diagnosis is equivocal/uncertain (i.e., clear distinction between benign or malignant cannot be achieved using clinical and/or histopathological features alone) despite the performance of standard-of-care test procedures and relevant ancillary tests (i.e., immunohistochemical stains)
• The specimen includes an area representative of the lesion or portion of the lesion that is suspicious for malignancy
• The patient may be subjected to additional intervention, such as re-excision and/or sentinel lymph node biopsy, as a result of the diagnostic uncertainty
• The patient has not been tested with the same or similar assay for the same clinical indication
• The test is validated for use in the intended-use population and is performed according to its stated intended-use
• The test demonstrates Analytical and Clinical Validity (AV and CV) and Clinical Utility (CU) and undergoes a technical assessment (TA) by MolDx ® to demonstrate compliance of the service with this policy
Tests that demonstrate similar indicated uses and equivalent or superior performance to covered tests may similarly be covered under this policy.
Summary of evidence (opening)
Melanoma is an aggressive cancer with an estimated 106,110 cases and 7,180 deaths in 2021. 1 The lifetime risk of developing melanoma in the United States is approximately 2.6% (1 in 38) for Caucasians, 0.1% (1 in 1,000) for African Americans, and 0.6% (1 in 167) for Latinos . 1 Melanoma is more common in men overall, but before age 50 the rates are higher in women than in men. The average age of people diagnosed with melanoma is 65. Many melanomas are curable if detected early and diagnosed accurately. The five year survival for localized melanoma is 99%, compared with only 27% among patients with distant metastases. 2
Melanoma can be difficult to diagnose, particularly in its earliest stages, yet accurate diagnosis of melanocytic neoplasms is vital to optimal patient outcomes. Histopathologic examination has long been the gold standard for melanoma diagnosis, and while it is adequate for most cases, evidence suggests that approximately 15-20% of all biopsied melanocytic neoplasms are difficult to diagnose by histopathology alone. 3-5 Subspecialty training and experience in dermatopathology is associated with improved diagnostic accuracy and subsequent clinical management of patients with challenging melanocytic lesions. 5-8 However, even experienced dermatopathologists disagree in some cases, and, depending on the type of lesions evaluated, diagnostic discordance may be substantial . 6,7,9,10 In equivocal cases, patients may receive diagnoses that are indeterminate or inaccurate, leading to inappropriate treatment. Unnecessary re-excisions, sentinel lymph node biopsies, and protracted clinical follow-up may result when a diagnostically challenging benign lesion is reported as indeterminate. 11,12 Conversely, a diagnostically challenging melanoma mistakenly classified as a benign nevus may result in undertreatment and subsequent progression to late-stage melanoma. 11,12 Consequently, adjuncts to histopathology have been sought in efforts to improve diagnostic accuracy in equivocal cases.
Gene expression profiles (GEP) can serve as beneficial adjuncts to histopathology in the evaluation of equivocal melanocytic lesions. The myPath® Melanoma assay (Castle Biosciences, Phoenix, AZ) is a 23-gene expression profile (23-GEP) developed to provide an objective, reproducible, and accurate adjunctive method for differentiating malignant melanoma from benign nevi. 13-16 The test is intended for use by dermatopathologists confronting primary cutaneous melanocytic neoplasms for which the diagnosis of malignant melanoma versus benign nevus is equivocal/uncertain (i.e., a clear distinction between benign or malignant cannot be achieved using clinical and/or histopathological features alone). Use of the test in these cases increases definitive diagnoses, and evidence suggests it may reduce unnecessary procedures in benign lesions. 17,18
The myPath® Melanoma test quantifies the expression of 23 genes by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Fourteen of the 23 genes are known to be over-expressed by malignant melanomas relative to benign nevi. The remaining 9 are stably expressed reference genes which allow correction for sample-to-sample variations in RT-PCR efficiency and errors in sample quantification (normalization). The signature genes represent 3 distinct pathways that contribute to melanoma pathogenesis, including aspects of melanocyte differentiation as well as characteristics of the tumor microenvironment such as cell-cell signaling and tumor-induced host immune responses. 13,14 The test uses 5 to 7 standard-thickness (4-5 µm) sections taken from the routinely processed formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue of the existing biopsy specimen, allowing its integration into routine clinical practice and its use even in small, early-stage lesions. The quantified expression of all 23 genes is combined algorithmically and reported as a single numerical score. That number (the myPath® Melanoma ‘score’), is plotted on a scale that depicts the entire range of scores observed in clinical validation studies. 14 Physicians receive a report showing this single numerical score and the corresponding classification: ‘likely malignant’, ‘likely benign’, or ‘indeterminate’.
The contractor cites 36 sources in the bibliography; the full summary and analysis of evidence are in the CMS record.
Dates, lineage and related policies
- Original determination effective
- 2023-08-06
- Current revision effective
- 2026-04-16
- Last reviewed by the contractor
- 2026-04-02
- MCD version
- 6
Other related documents: A59412 (Response to Comments).
Using this policy on a claim
Match the documented indication to the covered indications above before the service is scheduled, carry a diagnosis from the article's covered list on the claim line, and keep the elements the documentation section asks for in the record, because the contractor can request it later through medical review. A denial under this policy arrives as CARC 50 with remark N115; the LCD lookup guide walks through the appeal path and the Advance Beneficiary Notice rules, and the CGS Administrators, LLC hub lists every other active policy from the same contractor.
The same policy title at other contractors
Contractors often adopt each other's policies and then revise them separately, so the criteria and the diagnosis lists drift apart. The topic comparison lines up every version.
Frequently asked questions
What does LCD L39389 cover?
• The patient has not been tested with the same or similar assay for the same clinical indication The full indications and limitations are reproduced on this page from the CMS Medicare Coverage Database export of September 24, 2026.
Which states does LCD L39389 apply to?
CGS Administrators, LLC applies it to Medicare claims in KY, OH. A Local Coverage Determination binds only the contractor that wrote it; the same service in another jurisdiction is judged under that contractor's own policy or, where none exists, claim by claim.
Which diagnosis codes support medical necessity under LCD L39389?
The companion billing and coding article A59163 lists 18 ICD-10-CM codes in 1 group that support medical necessity; the first 18 appear on this page and the complete list is in the article on cms.gov.
How do I appeal a denial under LCD L39389?
The remittance carries claim adjustment reason code 50 with remark code N115, naming the LCD. Compare the documented indication with the policy's covered indications and the article's diagnosis list, then file a redetermination within 120 days with the record attached; if the service genuinely falls outside the policy, the patient can be billed only when a valid Advance Beneficiary Notice was obtained before the service.
Sources
Every figure on this page is taken from the CMS publications below, as released by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Projection built 2026-10-02. Verify against the primary file before billing or contracting decisions.
- Medicare Coverage Database, current LCD exportVersion MCD release 2026-09-24 · effective 2026-09-20 · file lcd.csvSHA-256 2fcc4251b6ddd1eb…
- Medicare Coverage Database, current Billing and Coding Articles exportVersion MCD release 2026-09-24 · effective 2026-09-20 · file article.csvSHA-256 f31932f1df3b4035…
- ICD-10-CM FY2027 code descriptionsVersion FY2027 · effective 2026-10-01 · file icd10cm_codes_2027.txtSHA-256 3c0583a38ee0e848…
Disclaimer
The policy text and code lists are reproduced from the CMS Medicare Coverage Database export as an operational reference. Verify against the current LCD and article on cms.gov before billing; coverage depends on the full record and the contractor. Not legal, clinical or billing advice.