Skip to main content

LCD L40238: MolDX: Genetic Testing for Hereditary Thrombophilia

LCD L40238, MolDX: Genetic Testing for Hereditary Thrombophilia, is the Local Coverage Determination that Palmetto GBA applies to claims from 7 states (AL, GA, NC, SC, TN, VA, WV), effective 2026-10-12. The policy text runs 348 words, and its billing and coding article A60256 lists 1,171 ICD-10-CM codes that support medical necessity for 3 procedure codes. 3 other contractors publish a policy with the same title, so the criteria that apply depend on where the service is furnished.

QuickIntell editorial content · Legacy registry date · Review not verified

Data effective
Data currency: Medicare Coverage Database LCD export release of September 24, 2026 (effective September 20, 2026). Next CMS release: weekly (Thursdays) for the MCD.
Contractor
Palmetto GBA
States and territories
7
AL GA NC SC TN VA WV
Revision effective
2026-10-12
Original effective
2026-10-12
Policy text
348 words
Covered ICD-10 codes (articles)
1171

Where this LCD applies

Each contract number is a jurisdiction on the remittance; the policy binds claims processed under these contracts and no others.

Contracts that apply LCD L40238
ContractContractorTypeStates
11201Palmetto GBAA and B and HHH MACSC
11301Palmetto GBAA and B and HHH MACVA
11401Palmetto GBAA and B and HHH MACWV
11501Palmetto GBAA and B and HHH MACNC
11202Palmetto GBAA and B and HHH MACSC
11302Palmetto GBAA and B and HHH MACVA
11402Palmetto GBAA and B and HHH MACWV
11502Palmetto GBAA and B and HHH MACNC
10111Palmetto GBAA and B MACAL
10211Palmetto GBAA and B MACGA
10311Palmetto GBAA and B MACTN
10112Palmetto GBAA and B MACAL
10212Palmetto GBAA and B MACGA
10312Palmetto GBAA and B MACTN

Billing and coding: diagnoses and procedure codes

Since 2019 the codes live in the companion article rather than the LCD. Billing and Coding A60256 (Billing and Coding: MolDX: Genetic Testing for Hereditary Thrombophilia) carries the diagnosis and procedure lists the contractor loads as the claims edit. CPT codes are shown as bare numbers because the descriptors are licensed by the AMA; HCPCS Level II descriptors are public and shown.

A60256: Billing and Coding: MolDX: Genetic Testing for Hereditary Thrombophilia (Billing and Coding)

Covered ICD-10-CM codes
1171
2 groups
Non-covered ICD-10-CM codes
0
Procedure codes listed
3
Full article
cms.gov record
First 24 covered ICD-10-CM codes in A60256
ICD-10-CMDescription (FY2027)
C00.0—
C00.1—
C00.2—
C00.3—
C00.4—
C00.5—
C00.6—
C00.8—
C00.9—
C01Malignant neoplasm of base of tongue
C02.0—
C02.1—
C02.2—
C02.3—
C02.4—
C02.8—
C02.9—
C03.0—
C03.1—
C03.9—
C04.0—
C04.1—
C04.8—
C04.9—

Procedure codes: 81240, 81241, 81479.

Coverage indications, limitations and medical necessity

This policy defines coverage for Lab-Developed Tests (LDTs), Federal Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared, and FDA-approved clinical laboratory tests for hereditary thrombophilia including Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) tests. This policy’s scope is specific for hereditary germline testing.

Criteria for Coverage

Genetic testing for hereditary thrombophilia is covered when ALL of the following requirements are met:

• The patient:

• Presents with venous thromboembolism (VTE) that is associated with non-surgical major transient or hormonal risk factors (as defined in American Society of Hematology (ASH) guidelines), OR

• Presents with cerebral or splanchnic venous thrombosis, in settings where short term primary treatment is the standard of care and testing will inform the decision for long-term anticoagulation (when anticoagulation would otherwise be discontinued); OR

• Currently carries a diagnosis of cancer and ALL of the following:

• is receiving systemic therapy in the ambulatory setting AND

• meets the clinical criteria for low or intermediate VTE risk as determined by a validated risk assessment tool recognized by national or international oncology consensus guidelines (e.g., ASH) AND

• has a family history of VTE in first degree relative (s).

• Genetic testing will guide clinical management relevant to VTE (e.g., initiation or duration of anticoagulation).

• The test performed includes at least the minimum genetic content (genes or genetic variants) with definitive or well-established guidelines-based evidence (e.g. as determined by ASH) required for clinical decision making for its intended use that can be reasonably detected by the test. A single variant may be tested if it is the only variant considered to be reasonable and necessary for a patient (i.e., a known familial variant).

• The test does not include additional genetic content that is not properly validated, or of unclear clinical validity or utility.

• The patient must not have been previously tested by the same or similar test for the same indication and genetic content, and testing must conform to all other applicable policy (e.g. provisions of repeat germline testing as defined in L38274).

• The test has satisfactorily completed a Technical Assessment (TA) by Molecular Diagnostic Services Program (MolDX ® ).

Summary of evidence (opening)

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is characterized by the formation of venous thrombi and is inclusive of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), which in turn increases the risk of pulmonary embolism (PE), a life-threatening complication. 1 VTE occurs with an incidence of approximately 1 to 1.5 per 1000 person-years, with an absolute lifetime risk of approximately 8-11%. 2-6 It is the third most common cause of death worldwide. 7 The risk of VTE increases with age, being approximately 1 in 10,000 persons per year in those under age 40 and increasing to 1 in 100 persons per year in those over age 75. 2,8 Following first incidence, recurrence risk is greatest within the first 6 to 12 months post-VTE. 9 The 5-year risk of VTE recurrence is estimated at approximately 20%, while the 10-year risk is estimated at approximately 30%. 2,9,10 Causality of VTE is often multifactorial, due to the interaction of a wide range of acquired and inherited risk factors, most of which span Virchow’s triad, which consists of stasis of blood flow, hypercoagulability, and endothelial injury. 1,7

A significant proportion of patients with venous thromboembolism have an acquired or inherited thrombophilia. 11 This is defined as one of several conditions that render a given individual at a higher-than-normal risk for VTE 11 and include the acquired antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) as well as hereditary thrombophilias such as gain of function mutations in factor V (factor V Leiden, FVL) and factor II c.*97G>A (also known as prothrombin 20210G>A, PGM), deficiencies of antithrombin (AT), protein C (PC), and protein S (PS). 2,11 Testing for inherited and acquired thrombophilia is often conducted in patients with VTE, particularly in those who present with VTE at a young age, experience recurrent VTE, have thrombosis at unusual sites, or have a family history of thrombophilia. 11 The proportion of variance attributed to genetic effects in VTE is estimated to be as high as 60% 12 and there is a moderate to high chance of discovering thrombophilia when testing patients with VTE or relatives of patients with VTE and thrombophilia. 11 Approximately 25% of unselected cases of VTE have a known genetic factor, with the rate increasing to 63% of familial cases. 2 Nevertheless, knowledge of hereditary thrombophilia status does not meaningfully impact patient management in the setting of acute thrombosis and the incremental clinical value of knowing about the presence or absence of thrombophilia may be low in many settings, such that the risks associated with testing may outweigh potential benefits. 13 Thrombophilia testing can lead to overdiagnosis, wherein patients are labeled with a disease or abnormal condition that would not have caused clinical harm if left undiscovered. As an unintended result, there may be physical, psychological, or financial harm to patients due to discovery of this condition. 11 As an example, patients may be inappropriately treated with anticoagulation, resulting in an increased risk of bleeding.

The American Society of Hematology has established evidence-based recommendations with respect to the clinical utility of thrombophilia testing in defined clinical scenarios, published as the 2023 Guidelines for Management of Venous Thromboembolism: Thrombophilia Testing (2023 ASH Thrombophilia Testing Guidelines). 11 The guidelines evaluated the clinical utility of conducting a thrombophilia testing panel to aid in clinical decision-making across 23 clinical scenarios. The thrombophilia testing panel described in the guidelines consists of FVL, PGM, and deficiencies of protein S, protein C and antithrombin, along with testing for acquired APS by assessment for lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, and anti-beta-2 glycoprotein 1 antibodies. 11 These are considered to be rational components of a thrombophilia panel due to consistent and reproducible VTE association. 11

FVL and PGM both result from a single nucleotide change and are easily identified by genetic testing. 2 The FVL mutation renders factor V resistant to cleavage by activated protein C (APC) and therefore prolongs its procoagulant activity. Genetic testing for FVL can be conducted as the primary diagnostic test or it can follow a positive result from a functional APC assay. PGM is a gain-of-function point mutation that leads to increased levels of prothrombin and prothrombin activity. Due to significant overlap with the upper limit of normal prothrombin levels, PGM must be identified through genetic testing. Finally, a myriad of pathogenic variants have been described in genes encoding protein C ( PROC ), protein S ( PROS1 ), and antithrombin ( SERPINC1 ); therefore, testing for these inherited thrombophilias is usually functional and involves assessment of activity or in some cases, antigen level. 9

The contractor cites 46 sources in the bibliography; the full summary and analysis of evidence are in the CMS record.

Dates, lineage and related policies

Original determination effective
2026-10-12
Current revision effective
2026-10-12
Last reviewed by the contractor
2026-07-07
MCD version
3

Other related documents: A60466 (Response to Comments).

Using this policy on a claim

Match the documented indication to the covered indications above before the service is scheduled, carry a diagnosis from the article's covered list on the claim line, and keep the elements the documentation section asks for in the record, because the contractor can request it later through medical review. A denial under this policy arrives as CARC 50 with remark N115; the LCD lookup guide walks through the appeal path and the Advance Beneficiary Notice rules, and the Palmetto GBA hub lists every other active policy from the same contractor.

The same policy title at other contractors

Contractors often adopt each other's policies and then revise them separately, so the criteria and the diagnosis lists drift apart. The topic comparison lines up every version.

Frequently asked questions

What does LCD L40238 cover?

• The patient must not have been previously tested by the same or similar test for the same indication and genetic content, and testing must conform to all other applicable policy (e.g. provisions of repeat germline testing as defined in L38274). The full indications and limitations are reproduced on this page from the CMS Medicare Coverage Database export of September 24, 2026.

Which states does LCD L40238 apply to?

Palmetto GBA applies it to Medicare claims in AL, GA, NC, SC, TN, VA, WV. A Local Coverage Determination binds only the contractor that wrote it; the same service in another jurisdiction is judged under that contractor's own policy or, where none exists, claim by claim.

Which diagnosis codes support medical necessity under LCD L40238?

The companion billing and coding article A60256 lists 1,171 ICD-10-CM codes in 2 groups that support medical necessity; the first 24 appear on this page and the complete list is in the article on cms.gov.

How do I appeal a denial under LCD L40238?

The remittance carries claim adjustment reason code 50 with remark code N115, naming the LCD. Compare the documented indication with the policy's covered indications and the article's diagnosis list, then file a redetermination within 120 days with the record attached; if the service genuinely falls outside the policy, the patient can be billed only when a valid Advance Beneficiary Notice was obtained before the service.

Sources

Every figure on this page is taken from the CMS publications below, as released by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Projection built 2026-10-02. Verify against the primary file before billing or contracting decisions.

Disclaimer

The policy text and code lists are reproduced from the CMS Medicare Coverage Database export as an operational reference. Verify against the current LCD and article on cms.gov before billing; coverage depends on the full record and the contractor. Not legal, clinical or billing advice.