Where this LCD applies
Each contract number is a jurisdiction on the remittance; the policy binds claims processed under these contracts and no others.
| Contract | Contractor | Type | States |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11201 | Palmetto GBA | A and B and HHH MAC | SC |
| 11301 | Palmetto GBA | A and B and HHH MAC | VA |
| 11401 | Palmetto GBA | A and B and HHH MAC | WV |
| 11501 | Palmetto GBA | A and B and HHH MAC | NC |
| 11202 | Palmetto GBA | A and B and HHH MAC | SC |
| 11302 | Palmetto GBA | A and B and HHH MAC | VA |
| 11402 | Palmetto GBA | A and B and HHH MAC | WV |
| 11502 | Palmetto GBA | A and B and HHH MAC | NC |
| 10111 | Palmetto GBA | A and B MAC | AL |
| 10211 | Palmetto GBA | A and B MAC | GA |
| 10311 | Palmetto GBA | A and B MAC | TN |
| 10112 | Palmetto GBA | A and B MAC | AL |
| 10212 | Palmetto GBA | A and B MAC | GA |
| 10312 | Palmetto GBA | A and B MAC | TN |
Billing and coding: diagnoses and procedure codes
Since 2019 the codes live in the companion article rather than the LCD. Billing and Coding A59714 (Billing and Coding: Botulinum Toxin Injections) carries the diagnosis and procedure lists the contractor loads as the claims edit. CPT codes are shown as bare numbers because the descriptors are licensed by the AMA; HCPCS Level II descriptors are public and shown.
A59714: Billing and Coding: Botulinum Toxin Injections (Billing and Coding, effective 2026-04-09)
- Covered ICD-10-CM codes
- 341
- 18 groups
- Non-covered ICD-10-CM codes
- 0
- Procedure codes listed
- 31
- Full article
- cms.gov record
| ICD-10-CM | Description (FY2027) |
|---|---|
| G04.1 | — |
| G11.4 | — |
| G24.02 | — |
| G24.09 | — |
| G24.1 | — |
| G24.2 | — |
| G24.3 | — |
| G24.4 | — |
| G24.5 | — |
| G24.8 | — |
| G25.0 | — |
| G25.1 | — |
| G25.2 | — |
| G25.61 | — |
| G25.69 | — |
| G25.89 | — |
| G35.A | — |
| G35.B0 | — |
| G35.B1 | — |
| G35.B2 | — |
| G35.C0 | — |
| G35.C1 | — |
| G35.C2 | — |
| G35.D | — |
Procedure codes: 31570, 31573, 43201, 43236, 46505, 52287, 64611, 64612, 64615, 64616, 64617, 64642, 64643, 64644, 64645, 64646, 64647, 64650, 64653, 67345, 76536, 76881, 76882, 76942, 95873, 95874, J0585 (Injection, Onabotulinumtoxina, 1 Unit), J0586 (Injection, Abobotulinumtoxina, 5 Units), J0587 (Injection, Rimabotulinumtoxinb, 100 Units), J0588 (Injection, Incobotulinumtoxin A, 1 Unit), J0589 (Injection, Daxibotulinumtoxina-Lanm, 1 Unit).
Coverage indications, limitations and medical necessity
General Indications and Limitations of Coverage
• Botulinum toxin dosing must be used in accordance with the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved labeling.
• For off-label botulinum toxin use without an FDA approved dosing indication, the qualified healthcare professional must provide robust published clinical evidence to support the dosing use.
• For off-label botulinum toxin use without an FDA approved serotype indication, the qualified healthcare professional must provide robust published clinical evidence to support the serotype use.
• For new FDA approved indications for botulinum toxin serotype or dosing recommendations after the effective date of this policy, the qualified healthcare professional must provide the updated published FDA prescribing information to support the use of the botulinum toxin serotype or dose.
• Botulinum toxin administration must not be given more frequently than every 12 weeks, regardless of diagnosis, unless specifically addressed in the policy.
• The use of botulinum toxin for all cosmetic procedures is not a covered benefit under Medicare; AND
• When botulinum toxin is used for an approved diagnosis, but the botulinum is also being used with cosmetic intent, the entire claim for the botulinum is not considered reasonable and necessary, AND
• The potency of each of the botulinum toxin serotypes are not interchangeable with other botulinum toxin serotypes and, therefore, units of biological activity of any 1 serotype cannot be compared to or converted into units of any other botulinum toxin serotype; AND
• Botulinum toxin injections (BTIs) are not considered reasonable and necessary for patients with a contraindication to botulinum toxin; AND
• BTIs are not considered reasonable and necessary for patients with existing medical conditions which could affect the neuromuscular function; AND
• BTIs are not considered reasonable and necessary for patients with hypersensitivity to any botulinum toxin preparation or to any of the components in the formulation of the serotype; AND
• BTIs are not considered reasonable and necessary for patients with severe clotting disorders; AND
• BTIs are not considered reasonable and necessary for patients with an infection at the injection site; AND
• Both conscious sedation and monitored anesthesia care (MAC) are not medically necessary for BTIs; AND
• When conservative treatment needs to be provided prior to the administration of botulinum toxin, a vague or nonspecific physician statement that conservative treatment measures were completed is not sufficient. The documentation must provide specific information regarding the conservative treatments which were used and an objective assessment of the intolerance or inadequacy of the response to the conservative measures.
• Image guidance is not considered reasonable and necessary for injection of botulinum toxin.
• Medicare will allow payment for 1 injection per site regardless of the number of injections made into the site. A site is defined as 1 area.
Specific Indications and Limitations of Coverage by Diagnosis
Achalasia
Definition:
Achalasia is a relatively rare primary motor esophageal disorder, characterized by incomplete relaxation of the esophageal gastric junction (EGJ) coupled with the absence of organized peristalsis along the esophageal body. Three achalasia subtypes have been defined based on the high-resolution manometry (HRM) findings in the esophageal body: type I or classic achalasia with low intraesophageal pressure, type II with pan-esophageal pressurization, and type III with high-amplitude spastic contractions.
Diagnosis:
The diagnostic criterion for achalasia is evaluated by HRM, which is recognized as the gold standard for diagnosis. 1,2 HRM measures the integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) at the EGJ, with an IRP greater than 15 mmHg serving as a critical diagnostic marker for achalasia. The Chicago Classification system enables the categorization of achalasia into 3 distinct subtypes based on the IRP and esophageal pressurization patterns observed during swallowing. Each subtype has specific clinical implications and guides the management strategy, with type II achalasia generally associated with the most favorable treatment outcomes. 1,2
Treatment:
BTI is an FDA off-label use consisting of endoscopic injections of the toxin into 4 quadrants of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). The treatment options in achalasia patients aim to improve symptoms by reducing the functional obstruction at the level of the gastroesophageal junction. Injection of botulinum toxin reduces LES pressure by inhibiting release of acetylcholine from nerve endings. 3-9
Indications of Coverage
Initial Botulinum Toxin Injections
In the management of achalasia, BTI is an FDA off-label use consisting of endoscopic injections of the toxin into 4 quadrants of the LES. 3-9 Initial BTIs for achalasia will be considered reasonable and necessary when the following requirements are met:
• Objective documentation of the clinical features consistent with the diagnosis of achalasia; AND
• Chronic achalasia measured on objective clinical scale*; AND
• Medically high-risk patients diagnosed with achalasia who cannot undergo other invasive treatments (peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), Heller myotomy, pneumatic dilation [PD]); 1,2,8,10-15 OR
• As a bridge for those patients diagnosed with achalasia awaiting more effective treatments such as Heller myotomy, PDs or POEM; 2 OR
• During work-up and treatment planning of definitive treatments for achalasia. 16,17
* The objective assessment must be performed and documented at baseline, after each diagnostic procedure, and at each follow-up assessment using the same scale during each assessment. There are several clinical scales to measure severity of achalasia, for example the Eckert Scale.
Initial Dosing Guidelines
• The initial dose of onabotulinumtoxinA is 80 to 100 Units.
Subsequent Botulinum Toxin Injections
Subsequent BTIs for achalasia will be considered reasonable and necessary when the following requirements are met:
• Documentation of informed clinical decisions regarding repeat botulinum toxin injections; AND
• Reassessment of the degree of persistent moderate to severe achalasia; AND
• There is evidence of a significant beneficial symptomatic response to the initial dose.
Subsequent Dosing Guidelines
• The subsequent dose of up to 100 Units onabotulinumtoxinA may be given 30 days after the initial dose.
Limitations of Coverage
BTIs are not considered reasonable and necessary for:
• The patient who has achalasia symptoms but insufficient manometric criteria to make the diagnosis.
• Patients with contraindications for upper endoscopy. 18
• Injection of botulinum toxin in the esophageal body . 1,2,8,13
• Initial or subsequent onabotulinumtoxinA doses above 100 Units. 1,2
Anal Fissure
Definition:
A linear tear in the anal mucosa typically extending into the internal anal sphincter. Anal fissures that persist for more than 6 weeks are classified as chronic. The internal sphincter spasm is believed to be the main etiology for the pathogenesis of chronic anal fissure. 19
Diagnosis:
Anal fissures are characterized by a longitudinal linear tear primarily caused by trauma or irritation from constipation or diarrhea. 20 Fissures are commonly located in the posterior midline. Variations in location, such as anterior midline or atypical lateral positions, necessitate a thorough evaluation due to potential underlying conditions. 20
Chronic fissures exhibit additional features such as a hypertrophied anal papilla, a sentinel tag, and possibly exposed internal anal sphincter muscle, indicative of underlying issues like sphincter hypertonicity and impaired wound healing. This distinction is crucial for diagnosis and treatment, as chronic fissures may display additional physical features such as a hypertrophied anal papilla at the proximal edge of the fissure, a sentinel tag (or skin tag) at the distal edge, and exposure of the internal anal sphincter muscle at the base of the fissure, indicating a more complex condition requiring specialized management strategies. 20
Indications of Coverage
Initial Botulinum Toxin Injections
Initial BTIs for anal fissure will be considered reasonable and necessary when the following requirements are met:
• The anal fissure has been present for more than 6 weeks; AND
• Conservative treatment has been tried for eliminating constipation and reducing anal sphincter spasm.
Initial Dosing Guidelines
• The initial treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA dosing for anal fissure is 20 Units (10 Units on each side of the fissure). 21,22
Subsequent Botulinum Toxin Injections
Subsequent BTIs for anal fissure will be considered reasonable and necessary when the following requirements are met:
• Documentation for informed clinical decision-making regarding repeat BTIs and surgical treatment; AND
• Reassessment of the symptoms and degree of persistent anal fissure.
Subsequent Dosing Guidelines
• A subsequent dose of onabotulinumtoxinA for anal fissure is up to 60 Units with the clinical trials demonstrating greater efficacy with lower doses. 20
Blepharospasm
Definition:
A focal dystonia involving the involuntary closure of the eyelids and spasms of the orbicularis oculi muscles characterized by sustained or intermittent muscle contractions resulting in mild blinking or sustained forced closure of the eyes.
Diagnosis:
To diagnose a patient with blepharospasm, clinicians should observe for involuntary contraction of the orbicularis oculi and other muscles involved in eyelid closure, which can range from sporadic and mildly irritating to functionally blinding. 23 The disorder often begins with infrequent bilateral eyelid twitching and may progress to forceful and frequent spasms, including symptoms like eyelid apraxia. Sensory stimulation such as touching the eyelids or certain activities may temporarily reduce the contractions.
Diagnosis is primarily clinical and considered a diagnosis of exclusion, with imaging or laboratory studies typically not indicated. The diagnostic criteria for blepharospasm have been proposed, with key features being bilateral spasms of the orbicularis oculi and nearby muscles of the upper face often with excessive blinking. 23 Clinicians may encounter patients presenting with associated symptoms such as anxiety, depression, or ocular surface diseases like blepharitis. 4 Differential diagnosis includes distinguishing from conditions like Meige syndrome, myokymia, hemifacial spasm, and others based on the symmetry, distribution, and accompanying symptoms. Photophobia and response to sensory triggers are common, and the patient's history of triggers and symptom progression is essential for accurate diagnosis. To accurately diagnose blepharospasm without inadvertently diagnosing Meige Syndrome, it's essential to focus on the primary symptom of involuntary eyelid closure, ensuring it is bilateral, synchronous, and stereotyped, without the presence of significant lower facial or neck muscle involvement. 23
Despite this focal blepharospasm being the second most common type of dystonia, a high percentage of individuals given this diagnosis had dystonia outside of the eye/upper face region 5 which makes the diagnosis inconsistent with existing guidelines for the diagnosis and classification of focal blepharospasm. These authors proposed that the diagnosis of focal blepharospasm be based on dystonic spasms of muscles in the upper face around the eyes only.
The most sensitive findings to diagnose blepharospasm is a stereotypical bilateral and synchronous orbicularis oculi muscle spasms inducing eyelid narrowing closure, the presence of a sensory trick (the sensory trick was defined as any kind of maneuver performed by the patient that led to a transient reduction in spasm severity in the period of time immediately after its execution 24 ), and increased blinking. 4 Blepharospasm can be classified into idiopathic, acquired, and inherited subtypes. 25
The rating instruments in the medical literature have coalesced into several main clinical scales, including the Jankovic Rating Scale (JRS) and Blepharospasm Disability Index (BSDI). 26
Indications of Coverage
Initial Botulinum Toxin Injections
Initial BTIs for blepharospasm will be considered reasonable and necessary when the following requirements are met:
• Objective documentation of the clinical features consistent with the diagnosis of blepharospasm; AND
• Chronic blepharospasm of at least 30 days duration measured using an objective clinical scale*; AND
• BTI therapy is accepted first line treatment for patients with blepharospasm.
* The objective assessment must be performed and documented at baseline, after each diagnostic procedure, and at each follow-up assessment using the same scale during each assessment. For example, there are several clinical scales to measure severity of blepharospasm, including the JRS and BSDI.
Initial Dosing Guidelines
• The initial treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA dosing for blepharospasm associated with dystonia is 1.25 Units-2.5 Units into each of 3 sites per affected facial or ocular muscle. 27
Subsequent Botulinum Toxin Injections
Subsequent BTIs for blepharospasm will be considered reasonable and necessary when the following requirements are met:
• Documentation of informed clinical decisions regarding repeat BTIs; AND
The policy text continues in the CMS record.
Summary of evidence (opening)
Achalasia
Society Guidelines
We found 3 guidelines issued by medical societies and 1 position statement: the American Society of Gastroenterology (ASGE)’s Guideline on the Management of Achalasia 2020 13 , the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus ( ISDE)’s 2018 Achalasia Guidelines 2 , the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) Clinical Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Achalasia, 2020 8 , and the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy ( ESGE) Guideline 2020 1 support BTI into the distal esophageal sphincter as an effective short-term treatment for achalasia, in medically high-risk patients who are not candidates for other invasive therapies.
The ASGE guidelines 13 were based on a systematic review and meta-analysis by Khashab et al. (2020). The review included 22 uncontrolled studies (published from inception to October 2017) in 730 achalasia patients who were treated with BTI. Clinical success, defined by an Eckardt score of 3, was achieved in 77% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72%-81%; I 2 value 35; P= 0.04) over a follow-up period ranging from 1 to 6 months. There was a statistically significant decrease in average LES pressure from 38.23 mm Hg (range, 34.40-42.06) before the procedure to 23.30 mm Hg (range, 20.79-25.81) after BTI (P The ESGE 1 performed a systematic review (discussed below under the systematic review by Weusten et al. (2020)) and Delphi consensus and aligned with previous recommendations. They additionally made specific dosing recommendations of 100 units onabotulinumtoxinA or equivalent of the toxin diluted in preservative-free saline that is injected in aliquots of 0.5–1mL using an injection needle in forward view just above the squamocolumnar junction in at least 4 quadrants. This was a strong recommendation, high quality of evidence, with a level of agreement of 100%. A multicenter randomized trial with injections of 50, 100, and 200 Units of BTI resulted in similar short-term results in LES pressure 1 month after injection 11 and in an SR, a dose of 100 units of botulinum toxin was used most frequently 77 , supporting this dosing recommendation.
The contractor cites 333 sources in the bibliography; the full summary and analysis of evidence are in the CMS record.
Dates, lineage and related policies
- Original determination effective
- 2026-02-22
- Current revision effective
- 2026-02-22
- Last reviewed by the contractor
- 2026-01-07
- MCD version
- 8
Other related documents: A60349 (Response to Comments).
Using this policy on a claim
Match the documented indication to the covered indications above before the service is scheduled, carry a diagnosis from the article's covered list on the claim line, and keep the elements the documentation section asks for in the record, because the contractor can request it later through medical review. A denial under this policy arrives as CARC 50 with remark N115; the LCD lookup guide walks through the appeal path and the Advance Beneficiary Notice rules, and the Palmetto GBA hub lists every other active policy from the same contractor.
The same policy title at other contractors
Contractors often adopt each other's policies and then revise them separately, so the criteria and the diagnosis lists drift apart. The topic comparison lines up every version.
Frequently asked questions
What does LCD L39836 cover?
• Documentation for informed clinical decision-making regarding repeat BTIs and surgical treatment; AND The full indications and limitations are reproduced on this page from the CMS Medicare Coverage Database export of September 24, 2026.
Which states does LCD L39836 apply to?
Palmetto GBA applies it to Medicare claims in AL, GA, NC, SC, TN, VA, WV. A Local Coverage Determination binds only the contractor that wrote it; the same service in another jurisdiction is judged under that contractor's own policy or, where none exists, claim by claim.
Which diagnosis codes support medical necessity under LCD L39836?
The companion billing and coding article A59714 lists 341 ICD-10-CM codes in 18 groups that support medical necessity; the first 24 appear on this page and the complete list is in the article on cms.gov.
How do I appeal a denial under LCD L39836?
The remittance carries claim adjustment reason code 50 with remark code N115, naming the LCD. Compare the documented indication with the policy's covered indications and the article's diagnosis list, then file a redetermination within 120 days with the record attached; if the service genuinely falls outside the policy, the patient can be billed only when a valid Advance Beneficiary Notice was obtained before the service.
Sources
Every figure on this page is taken from the CMS publications below, as released by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Projection built 2026-10-02. Verify against the primary file before billing or contracting decisions.
- Medicare Coverage Database, current LCD exportVersion MCD release 2026-09-24 · effective 2026-09-20 · file lcd.csvSHA-256 2fcc4251b6ddd1eb…
- Medicare Coverage Database, current Billing and Coding Articles exportVersion MCD release 2026-09-24 · effective 2026-09-20 · file article.csvSHA-256 f31932f1df3b4035…
- ICD-10-CM FY2027 code descriptionsVersion FY2027 · effective 2026-10-01 · file icd10cm_codes_2027.txtSHA-256 3c0583a38ee0e848…
Disclaimer
The policy text and code lists are reproduced from the CMS Medicare Coverage Database export as an operational reference. Verify against the current LCD and article on cms.gov before billing; coverage depends on the full record and the contractor. Not legal, clinical or billing advice.