Where this LCD applies
Each contract number is a jurisdiction on the remittance; the policy binds claims processed under these contracts and no others.
| Contract | Contractor | Type | States |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06101 | Wellpoint Federal | MAC - Part A | IL |
| 06201 | Wellpoint Federal | MAC - Part A | MN |
| 06301 | Wellpoint Federal | MAC - Part A | WI |
| 06102 | Wellpoint Federal | MAC - Part B | IL |
| 06202 | Wellpoint Federal | MAC - Part B | MN |
| 06302 | Wellpoint Federal | MAC - Part B | WI |
| 13101 | Wellpoint Federal | A and B and HHH MAC | CT |
| 13201 | Wellpoint Federal | A and B and HHH MAC | NY |
| 13102 | Wellpoint Federal | A and B and HHH MAC | CT |
| 13202 | Wellpoint Federal | A and B and HHH MAC | DN |
| 13282 | Wellpoint Federal | A and B and HHH MAC | UN |
| 13292 | Wellpoint Federal | A and B and HHH MAC | QN |
| 14411 | Wellpoint Federal | A and B and HHH MAC | RI |
| 14211 | Wellpoint Federal | A and B and HHH MAC | MA |
| 14311 | Wellpoint Federal | A and B and HHH MAC | NH |
| 14511 | Wellpoint Federal | A and B and HHH MAC | VT |
| 14111 | Wellpoint Federal | A and B and HHH MAC | ME |
| 14112 | Wellpoint Federal | A and B and HHH MAC | ME |
| 14212 | Wellpoint Federal | A and B and HHH MAC | MA |
| 14312 | Wellpoint Federal | A and B and HHH MAC | NH |
| 14512 | Wellpoint Federal | A and B and HHH MAC | VT |
| 14412 | Wellpoint Federal | A and B and HHH MAC | RI |
Billing and coding: diagnoses and procedure codes
Since 2019 the codes live in the companion article rather than the LCD. Billing and Coding A58921 (Billing and Coding: Mass Spectrometry (MS) Testing in Monoclonal Gammopathy (MG)) carries the diagnosis and procedure lists the contractor loads as the claims edit. CPT codes are shown as bare numbers because the descriptors are licensed by the AMA; HCPCS Level II descriptors are public and shown.
A58921: Billing and Coding: Mass Spectrometry (MS) Testing in Monoclonal Gammopathy (MG) (Billing and Coding, effective 2026-04-01)
- Covered ICD-10-CM codes
- 82
- 1 group
- Non-covered ICD-10-CM codes
- 0
- Procedure codes listed
- 1
- Full article
- cms.gov record
| ICD-10-CM | Description (FY2027) |
|---|---|
| C83.00 | — |
| C88.00 | — |
| C88.20 | — |
| C90.00 | — |
| C90.01 | — |
| C90.02 | — |
| C90.10 | — |
| C90.20 | — |
| C90.30 | — |
| C91.10 | — |
| D47.2 | — |
| D63.8 | — |
| D64.9 | — |
| D86.85 | — |
| E85.0 | — |
| E85.2 | — |
| E85.4 | — |
| E85.81 | — |
| E85.82 | — |
| E85.89 | — |
| E85.9 | — |
| G62.9 | — |
| I11.0 | — |
| I13.0 | — |
Procedure codes: 0077U.
Coverage indications, limitations and medical necessity
Indications of Coverage
The use of serum mass spectrometry (MS) in monoclonal gammopathies (MGs), and the concurrent use of serum or urine immunofixation electrophoresis (sIFE) is considered medically necessary for:
• Diagnosis: Initial detection of M-protein in patients with suspected monoclonal gammopathy (MG) to confirm a serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) or serum free light-chain (sFLC) abnormality (1), or
• Monitoring:
• Discrimination between therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and endogenous M-proteins (2), or
• Treatment response assessment per guidelines (3-5)
Limitations of Coverage (not covered)
• Screening
Summary of evidence (opening)
Monoclonal gammopathy (MG) is characterized by the proliferation of a single clone of plasma cells which produces monoclonal immunoglobulin protein (M-protein). The M-protein can be an intact immunoglobulin (i.e., containing both heavy and light chains), only light chains (e.g., AL [light chain] amyloidosis), or rarely of heavy chains only (6). The prevalence of M-protein is relatively high, being detected in approximately 3% of the general adult population over 50 years old, and in up to 7% of those seeking medical evaluation (7). MGs represent a spectrum of at least 18 distinct entities, ranging from an asymptomatic limited clonal expansion of plasma cells (e.g., monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS)), to the potentially life-threatening, such as multiple myeloma (MM) and AL amyloidosis. Therefore, timely diagnosis and treatment to prevent irreversible organ damage is critical. A search for M-protein should be considered in any patient with an elevated total serum protein or otherwise unexplained signs and symptoms suggestive of a plasma cell disorder (6).
However, the process for identifying patients with MGs is complex and depends on clinical and diagnostic testing information. Laboratories have developed disparate practices for M-protein detection and quantitative measurement, complicating result harmonization, likely resulting in suboptimal detection of treatable MGs (1). Currently, suspected MGs are initially detected using a combination of three serum-based diagnostic tests: serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP), serum immunofixation electrophoresis (sIFE), and serum measurement of free light-chain (sFLC) (1,5). SPEP testing for M-protein began in the 1930s and has since steadily improved in resolution. The M-protein usually presents as a single narrow peak; in contrast, a broad-based band usually suggests a polyclonal increase in immunoglobulins (usually an infectious, inflammatory, or reactive process). The initial SPEP should be performed in combination with sIFE (uses antibodies against heavy and light chain components) both to confirm monoclonality and determine isotype (the heavy and light chain class, e.g., IgG kappa). M-protein isotype has significance for prognosis and risk-stratification (e.g., progression of MGUS to MM) (8). The sFLC assay is an antibody-based system that can detect low concentrations of monoclonal free light chains (i.e., kappa or lambda) in the serum. FLC quantification is the most analytically sensitive blood-based method commercially available to diagnose and monitor patients with MGs, and is sometimes the only indication of a MG. Assessing changes in M-protein levels helps track disease progression and response to treatment (5).
Other emerging laboratory procedures to detect M-proteins include immunosubtraction (ISUB), mass spectrometry (MS), and heavy/light chain (HLC) isotype quantitative measurement. The MS method combines nanobody enrichment of immunoglobulins with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDITOF- MS) (also termed MASS-FIX, Mayo Medical Laboratories). The idea behind MS is that molecular mass can be used instead of electrophoretic patterns to identify and quantify the M-protein since each light and heavy chain has a unique amino acid sequence, and thus a unique molecular mass whose increased concentration could be distinguished from the normal polyclonal background (9). In addition to detection, MS might be able to isotype the M-protein because each immunoglobulin has a constant region with an amino acid sequence unique to each isotype. The multiple charged light and heavy chain ions are converted to their molecular masses, and reconstructed peak area calculations for light chains are used for quantification. Thus, in theory, the MASS-FIX assay uses the unique molecular mass signatures of the different Ig isotypes to generate mass spectra from which M-proteins could be identified, isotyped, and quantified.
A 2016 validation study found comparable analytic sensitivity of MASS-FIX with SPEP and IFE (10). MASS-FIX detected all M-proteins that were detectable by urine or serum protein electrophoresis. In serial dilution studies, MASS-FIX was more analytically sensitive than IFE (identified an M-protein in a higher percentage of samples at every dilution), and where they agreed provided the same primary isotype information for 98% of serum M-proteins (n = 152) and 95% of urine M-proteins (n = 55). A subsequent prospective study of paired serum and urine samples from 257 patients confirmed comparable sensitivity with serum/urine PEP/IFE and sFLC when serum and urine MASS-FIX results were combined (7). A more recent study of 226 patients diagnosed with MGUS or related gammopathy, considered negative for MGUS by protein electrophoresis and sFLC assay, found that M-protein could be detected at baseline in only 24 patients (10.6%) by IFE compared with 113 patients (50%) by MADLI-TOF mass spectrometry (11). IFE cannot distinguish if two bands of the same isotype represent biclonal proteins or M-proteins with some other feature. In a study of 81 serum samples with multiple IFE bands of the same isotype, MASS-FIX was able to characterize them as monoclonal or biclonal (12). In a study of 127 patient sera with abnormal FLC ratios, 43% of monoclonal proteins were confirmed by IFE, 57% by MALDI-TOF MS without FLC enrichment, and 87% with FLC enrichment MALDI-TOF MS (13). The authors conclude that FLC immunoenrichment coupled to MALDI-TOF MS enables direct detection of mFLCs, significantly increasing the confirmation of abnormal serum FLC ratios (a more indirect methodology), thus improving verification of disease in patients with light chain plasma cell disorders.
The contractor cites 24 sources in the bibliography; the full summary and analysis of evidence are in the CMS record.
Dates, lineage and related policies
- Original determination effective
- 2022-08-01
- Current revision effective
- 2026-04-01
- Last reviewed by the contractor
- 2022-04-01
- MCD version
- 8
Other related documents: A59900 (Response to Comments).
Using this policy on a claim
Match the documented indication to the covered indications above before the service is scheduled, carry a diagnosis from the article's covered list on the claim line, and keep the elements the documentation section asks for in the record, because the contractor can request it later through medical review. A denial under this policy arrives as CARC 50 with remark N115; the LCD lookup guide walks through the appeal path and the Advance Beneficiary Notice rules, and the Wellpoint Federal hub lists every other active policy from the same contractor.
Frequently asked questions
What does LCD L39189 cover?
The use of serum mass spectrometry (MS) in monoclonal gammopathies (MGs), and the concurrent use of serum or urine immunofixation electrophoresis (sIFE) is considered medically necessary for: The full indications and limitations are reproduced on this page from the CMS Medicare Coverage Database export of September 24, 2026.
Which states does LCD L39189 apply to?
Wellpoint Federal applies it to Medicare claims in CT, DN, IL, MA, ME, MN, NH, NY, QN, RI, UN, VT, WI. A Local Coverage Determination binds only the contractor that wrote it; the same service in another jurisdiction is judged under that contractor's own policy or, where none exists, claim by claim.
Which diagnosis codes support medical necessity under LCD L39189?
The companion billing and coding article A58921 lists 82 ICD-10-CM codes in 1 group that support medical necessity; the first 24 appear on this page and the complete list is in the article on cms.gov.
How do I appeal a denial under LCD L39189?
The remittance carries claim adjustment reason code 50 with remark code N115, naming the LCD. Compare the documented indication with the policy's covered indications and the article's diagnosis list, then file a redetermination within 120 days with the record attached; if the service genuinely falls outside the policy, the patient can be billed only when a valid Advance Beneficiary Notice was obtained before the service.
Sources
Every figure on this page is taken from the CMS publications below, as released by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Projection built 2026-10-02. Verify against the primary file before billing or contracting decisions.
- Medicare Coverage Database, current LCD exportVersion MCD release 2026-09-24 · effective 2026-09-20 · file lcd.csvSHA-256 2fcc4251b6ddd1eb…
- Medicare Coverage Database, current Billing and Coding Articles exportVersion MCD release 2026-09-24 · effective 2026-09-20 · file article.csvSHA-256 f31932f1df3b4035…
- ICD-10-CM FY2027 code descriptionsVersion FY2027 · effective 2026-10-01 · file icd10cm_codes_2027.txtSHA-256 3c0583a38ee0e848…
Disclaimer
The policy text and code lists are reproduced from the CMS Medicare Coverage Database export as an operational reference. Verify against the current LCD and article on cms.gov before billing; coverage depends on the full record and the contractor. Not legal, clinical or billing advice.