Skip to main content
Call
Codingaka V24, 2020 HCC Model, CMS-HCC Model V24

What is CMS-HCC V24 Risk Adjustment Model? Definition, Formula, and Benchmark

Reviewed by QuickIntell RCM Editorial Team · Last reviewed

Updated

Definition

CMS-HCC V24 is the Medicare Advantage risk-adjustment model used for payment years 2020 through 2023 and blended with V28 during the 2024–2025 transition. V24 maps ICD-10-CM diagnoses to ~86 HCCs with coefficients calibrated to 2014 FFS cost data, and remains the reference model for historical audit and reconciliation work.

Overview

CMS-HCC V24 is the risk-adjustment model CMS used for Medicare Advantage payment from payment year 2020 through 2023 and which continues to contribute to the blended payment calculation during the 2024 and 2025 V28 phase-in. V24 was an incremental update from V22, refining several condition categories to reflect observed cost patterns but retaining the broad HCC taxonomy that had been in place since 2013.

The V24 model contains approximately 86 HCC categories mapped from ICD-10-CM diagnoses, with disease-interaction terms that capture the additional cost impact when certain conditions co-occur (for example, diabetes with CKD). Coefficients were calibrated against 2014 FFS expenditure data with subsequent trending, and remained stable across the payment years V24 was in effect — a stability that let plans and providers build multi-year coding and documentation programs with confidence that the rules would not change underneath them.

V24 remains operationally relevant for several reasons. First, it is still blended with V28 during the transition window (67% V24 in 2024, 33% V24 in 2025), so current-payment calculations still reference V24 coefficients. Second, RADV and OIG audit work for payment years 2020–2023 continues to use V24 mappings to validate documentation. Third, multi-year retrospective financial analyses and actuarial risk-score reconciliations almost always compare current-year V28 reporting against V24 baselines to measure the model-change impact separately from membership and documentation effects.

A small number of ICD-10-CM diagnoses that mapped to an HCC in V24 no longer do in V28 — the approximately 2,294 delisted codes that drove much of the V28 RAF compression. Conversely, V28 introduced some new condition granularity (more specific dementia and renal failure subcategories) that did not exist separately in V24. Risk-adjustment teams often maintain parallel V24/V28 mappings during transition years so that suspect-condition lists, provider education materials, and RADV-defense binders remain usable across both models.

For operational RCM teams, the main V24 artifact worth preserving is the crosswalk document — the authoritative mapping of every ICD-10-CM code to its V24 HCC. CMS publishes the crosswalk as a downloadable file updated annually to reflect the ICD-10-CM code-set version in effect for each fiscal year. Third-party software vendors replicate this mapping in their code. Keeping the V24 crosswalk in your risk-adjustment tooling long after V28 becomes the single payment model is a practical necessity for historical audit support.

From a coding-compliance standpoint, CMS-HCC V24 Risk Adjustment Model lives at the intersection of CPT-category specificity, payer-specific guidance, and internal documentation standards. Practices that run a quarterly CMS-HCC V24 Risk Adjustment Model audit against cms hcc v28 and hierarchical condition category consistently close the coder-provider feedback loop faster than practices that wait for the annual OIG or payer audit to surface the pattern. Reviewers on this site flag CMS-HCC V24 Risk Adjustment Model entries whenever payer guidance shifts materially so the associated claim-scrubber logic is updated before the next billing cycle.

Industry benchmark

Used for MA payment years 2020–2023 (full weight) and 2024–2025 (blended with V28). No further CMS recalibrations of V24 coefficients are planned; V28 will be the sole model from 2026 forward.

Worked example

A plan reconciling a 2022 payment receives a RADV finding in 2026. The audit uses V24 mappings to validate HCCs reported against 2022 encounters. The plan's RADV-defense team must produce documentation evaluated under V24 rules even though current operations run under V28.

Frequently asked questions — CMS-HCC V24 Risk Adjustment Model

Is V24 still in use?

Yes for 2024 and 2025 payment years (blended with V28) and for all RADV/OIG audit work covering payment years 2020–2023. V24 becomes fully supplanted by V28 for 2026 payments forward.

How does V24 differ from V22?

V24 incrementally refined several condition categories (including mental-health and chronic-kidney-disease granularity) and recalibrated coefficients. It did not fundamentally restructure the HCC taxonomy — that restructuring came later in V28.

Why retain V24 crosswalks after 2026?

RADV audits and appeals frequently span multiple years past the audited payment year. A 2022 payment-year audit may still be in reconsideration in 2027, and that proceeding will use V24 mappings regardless of the current payment model.

Disclaimer

This glossary entry is operational reference for revenue-cycle and medical-billing professionals. It is not legal, clinical, or contractual advice. Industry benchmarks cite named public sources where available; always verify against the current guidance from the authority body before relying on a number in a contract, policy, or compliance filing.