Skip to main content
Call
Codingaka V28, 2024 HCC Model, CMS-HCC Model V28

What is CMS-HCC V28 Risk Adjustment Model? Definition, Formula, and Benchmark

Reviewed by QuickIntell RCM Editorial Team · Last reviewed

Updated

Definition

CMS-HCC V28 is the updated Medicare Advantage risk-adjustment model phased in starting payment year 2024. It restructured the HCC taxonomy, removed some previously-included conditions, adjusted coefficients, and is being blended with V24 on a three-year transition schedule. V28 materially lowers RAF scores for many plans.

Overview

CMS-HCC V28 is the risk-adjustment model CMS began phasing in for Medicare Advantage payment year 2024. It replaces the long-standing V24 model via a three-year blended transition: 2024 pays at 67% V24 / 33% V28, 2025 at 33% V24 / 67% V28, and 2026 forward at 100% V28.

V28 introduced material structural changes. Approximately 2,294 ICD-10-CM diagnoses that mapped to an HCC in V24 no longer map to any category in V28 — these are often referred to as "delisted" conditions. Coefficient values were rebalanced based on updated FFS cost data, with some chronic categories (diabetes without complications, certain vascular conditions) receiving lower coefficients and others (severe psychiatric illness, multiple renal failure subtypes) receiving higher coefficients. The overall effect for most plans is a reduction in average RAF of 2% to 7% depending on membership mix.

CMS justified V28 as a recalibration to current clinical practice and cost patterns. Industry responses have been mixed: plans with heavy chronic-condition documentation generally see less impact, while plans that relied on high-volume low-coefficient chronic codes (diabetes without complications is a frequent example) see larger RAF reductions. AHIP and individual plans have argued that V28 effectively compounds the coding intensity adjustment, further compressing MA economics.

Operationally V28 drives several changes in risk-adjustment programs. Chart review targeting must be re-prioritized toward conditions that remain high-coefficient in V28 (for example, specific diabetes complications coded to the subtype level, CKD stages 4–5, dementia with behavioral disturbance). Provider documentation training must emphasize the specificity V28 now requires — generic diabetes documentation that coded to 250.00 equivalents in V24 no longer carries the same weight when mapped into V28's restructured diabetes tree. Prospective coding suspect-condition lists have been rebuilt by vendors and internal teams to reflect V28 mappings.

CMS has published an official ICD-10-to-HCC mapping table for V28 that replaces the V24 crosswalk. Risk-adjustment vendors release updated software each Q4 to support the coming payment year's blend. Provider groups receiving risk-adjustment feedback reports from payers should confirm the report reflects the correct blended model for the payment year under review.

RADV audit methodology is agnostic to model version — auditors validate documentation against reported HCCs regardless of whether the HCC is under V24 or V28 coefficients. However, post-2024 audit findings implicitly reflect whether the reported HCCs are still relevant under V28; a plan that continued to submit delisted conditions faces no V28 recoupment (the payment was already zero) but faces compliance exposure if the condition was also unsupported.

Industry benchmark

CMS modeling estimates average plan RAF reduction of 3.1% under full V28 vs V24; industry analysts reported observed declines of 2–7% depending on membership mix, with geographically heterogeneous plans seeing larger impacts.

Worked example

An MA plan with 60,000 members had an average V24 RAF of 1.18. Under the 2025 payment year 33/67 V24/V28 blend, the effective RAF is 0.33 × 1.18 + 0.67 × 1.11 = 1.133. Against a $1,000 base rate, the RAF decline from 1.18 to 1.133 represents approximately $34M of annual revenue compression. At full V28 in 2026, the plan expects RAF of about 1.10 pending documentation improvements targeted at V28 priorities.

Frequently asked questions — CMS-HCC V28 Risk Adjustment Model

When does V28 fully replace V24?

Payment year 2026. The transition is phased: 2024 = 67/33 V24/V28, 2025 = 33/67, 2026+ = 100% V28. Plans should track the blend percentage for each payment year when reconciling payments.

Why does V28 lower risk scores for many plans?

V28 removed ~2,294 ICD-10-CM codes from HCC mapping and rebalanced coefficients based on updated FFS cost data. Plans that relied heavily on removed or now-lower-weight categories see RAF declines.

Do providers need to change their coding because of V28?

Yes — documentation should target the specificity V28 rewards. Generic diabetes documentation now carries less weight; specific complication and organ-system subtype documentation carries more. Chart-review suspect lists have been rebuilt for V28.

Disclaimer

This glossary entry is operational reference for revenue-cycle and medical-billing professionals. It is not legal, clinical, or contractual advice. Industry benchmarks cite named public sources where available; always verify against the current guidance from the authority body before relying on a number in a contract, policy, or compliance filing.